Voddie Baucham Doublespeak: Race, Kin and Melanin

Hans Gygax and Patrik Os discuss a question and answer video of Voddie Baucham, wherein Voddie acknowledges the reality of race, then denies it minutes later.

The question and answer session is from a YouTube video title: “Watch Voddie Baucham Reaction When Asked A “Racist” Question”, posted by Off The Kirb Ministries.

See the full video of Baucham’s response here.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4dEYN…

Comments

  1. Doug

    Bauchman’s simplistic egalitarianism is emptied by St.Paul in;

    1 Cor 1:22-24 For Jews request a sign, and Greeks seek after wisdom; but we preach Christ crucified, to the Jews a stumbling block and to the Greeks foolishness, but to those who are called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God and the wisdom of God.

    Racial differences emphasize general learning and acceptance variations, though the Truth never changes.

    1 Cor 9:19-23 For though I am free from all men, I have made myself a servant to all, that I might win the more; and to the Jews I became as a Jew, that I might win Jews; to those who are under the law, as under the law, that I might win those who are under the law; to those who are without law, as without law (not being without law toward God, but under law toward Christ), that I might win those who are without law; to the weak I became as weak, that I might win the weak. I have become all things to all men, that I might by all means save some. Now this I do for the gospel’s sake, that I may be partaker of it with you.

    A “cookie-cutter” model of witness is definitely not prescribed by the greatest evangelist. The nature of the audience transforms the delivery. The message is the same but its form differs depending on the the recipients race among other characteristics.

    God’s obvious design demonstrates different races are different. They have differences that only a deliberate deceiver would deny. God’s order had the races living in different histories and geographies. Even when He brings these various peoples together in His Heavenly Kingdom He will still preserve His perfect order in retaining their created distinctions in Heaven (Rev 21:24-26).

  2. Paul

    The jewess , who appropriated the role teacher travailed for a whole year in the class room before writing her book and returning to the baily . She used the melanin thing in schools to indoctrinate children. It seems to have worked . But we must give honourable mention to her affiliates of media and legislature .

    I listened to the above pastor , or evangelist Voddie Baucham in another setting. He comes from the seminary . He is good relative to the deplorable hagiographic worship infecting white churches . He seems more genuinely autonomous but reiteration reveals an holy spirit of ulterior motive. He also can not conceal a pavonine self consciousness.

    In the body of CHrist there are many gifts and offices according to Paul which proscribe discrimination. The Greek have been cohabiting with the remaining two tribes of Abraham for centuries . Neither greek nor Jew nor even the obnoxious gentile.

    But how Paul could ever reconcile the Jew with the Samaritan is a raciall issue . Is it not ? Although I do not remember ever , that the chief sinner ever addressed them or “become a Samaritan to win the Samaritan .”

    One is the prime number which still fascinates the wise and powers of darkness… Unification requires that, all carnal differences are abjured or exceeded. However also all carnal or worldly relations. This should prohibit marriage but if marriage is advised does not degrade it; but elevate as a sacrament . It is subject again to divine law or at least the natural law of discrimination of perfect design . Not so? Presuming law at all in a world that is not constrained by unworldly by its unworldly .

    Today anything learned without discernment from a pulpit is sullied with the unconverted body politic , which through profane and unlawful agreement should be separated .or alienated . Is this holy separation and unholy lie?. It is a degradation of CHrist and blasphemy of the Holy SPirit to begin with traducing it amongst others as an earthly religion.

    Such confession of disavowal condemns the state , Paul taken out of context not withstanding. Is the state now divine or supernal? Not completely ; it must answer to Jesrael. as do the churches ; an interesting coincidence.

    The central churches represent the state not the body or bride of Christ. This is what they designed from the start . Separation of the two means censoring the divine . It is old testament subversion.

    Visit a black church Sunday, watch a ball game, or a current Hollywood creation . See what melanin can do.

  3. Scott Craig Mooney

    “Politically Correct” orthodoxy grows in complexity. Certain ones are allowed to speak of “my people” — and even are applauded for doing so — and certain other ones are not. But a fellow like Baucham throws them for a loop. PC orthodoxy decrees, “Thou shalt not criticize blacks.” PC orthodoxy also decrees, “Thou shalt not criticize homosexuality.” Now here is a black guy who criticizes homosexuality. What can the high priests of PC do with him? If they defend homosexuality and thus criticize Baucham, they violate one of their sacred creeds. If they defend Baucham and thus criticize homosexuality, they violate another one of their sacred creeds. The naive observer begins to draw his own conclusions, and the best that propaganda can do at this point is, “Pay no attention to that man behind the curtain!”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *